![]() ![]() The Canon 100mm macro lenses offer a tripod collar as an option. Not one of my finer investments, but I did buy it as a refurb. My one totally manual "modern" Canon lens is the crazy MP-E 65mm, which provides magnification up to 5X. Older Canon lenses precede the electronic EF mount and, by definition are completely mechanical with no electronic capability. ![]() I set aperture on the camera, not on the lens. AFAIK, none of the 90-105mm macro lenses available in Nikon mount offer a tripod collar. Then you can "mess around" with aperture or not as you choose from the camera body, the same as you would with your Canon gear.Ĭorrect. For use with a D7200, you just leave this set to the minimum value of f/32. The Tokina has an aperture ring, which allows it to be used with pre-1996 Nikon film cameras as well as more modern gear. I didn't think any lenses in this range have a collar, or a spot to mount a collar. A 100mm is sufficiently compact that you can safely use the camera tripod mount point. This surprises me (and doesn't seem to show as an inclusion, or option, when I checked Canon 100mm lenses on-line). You might also look at the Tamron 90mm macro lens. But, for me, the newer Sigma would win out. The Sigma is a more modern version (2012 vintage), which includes Optical Stabilization. Can Canon cameras use older lenses with aperture rings? For some reason, the Canon version of the Tokina lens doesn't have an aperture ring and doesn't need the same set-up process. This is the case with all older lens with aperture rings mounted to Nikons. In order for the exposure meter on the camera to meter and control aperture, the lens has to be set to the smallest aperture setting (f/32 here). The Nikon version still has an aperture ring. The Tokina is an old design (2007 vintage). (I haven't looked at the branded Nikon, so I don't know about that.) Apparently, that's not the case for these Sigma and Tokina lenses. What's going on?Īnd one last thing - My Canon 100mm macro comes with a tripod collar. I don't have to mess around with aperture. What in the world does that mean? With my Canon, I just mount the lens, set the lens barrel switch to MF and go. Note: When set on other than the minimum aperture value (f/32), the "FEE" error message flashes and the shutter cannot be released. When setting the aperture value to f/32 and then changing it by the dial on the camera, the aperture value displayed in the viewfinder will be other than f/32.Īt this time, the diaphragm blades do not move but will operate according to the aperture value displayed when shuttering. To prevent accidental movements of the aperture ring from the minimum aperture value the ring can be locked in place with the small slide switch adjacent to the ring (to release the lock, slide the lever to the opposite side). When using with a Nikon DSLR camera or a film camera with CPU system, it is necessary to set the aperture ring to the minimum aperture value (f/32). Tokina AT-X M100 AF PRO D for Nikon mount conforms to the specifications of "Ai AF-D" Nikon lenses. I did see something on the Tokina website that, as a Canon shooter, I totally do not understand: She's currently running a D7200, so autofocus should be no problem. ![]() So if you're not sure or you want the benefit of image stabilization, choose the Sigma. The current Sigma 105mm OS should be compatible with all Nikon dSLR's. If she has a D3x00 or D5x00, the Tokina won't allow autofocus operation. Opinions and recommendations would be appreciated.ĭo you know which camera your girlfriend owns? Unfortunately, compatibility in the Nikon system is not as simple as it is with Canon. Given that the genuine Nikon 105mm macro is a budget buster, the choice comes down to the Sigma 105mm or the Tokina 100mm. But, my girlfriend is a Nikon shooter with a birthday approaching.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |